An argument with the founder of philosophy

Iqbal & Plato

Plato is the foundation stone of Western philosophy — the thinker who, more than any other, taught the West to look past the changing physical world toward a realm of unchanging, perfect Ideas. For more than two thousand years his prestige was almost beyond question. Iqbal questioned it.

In Asrar-e-Khudi — 'The Secrets of the Self', his first major Persian poem, published in 1915 — Iqbal devoted a passage directly to Plato, and the verdict is severe. He charged Plato with teaching people to shun the visible world, to distrust the senses, to treat action as beneath them and the invisible as the only thing worth loving. Plato, he wrote, made loss look like profit and was 'enraptured by the nonexistent'. Iqbal even reached for a startling image, calling that whole cast of mind a kind of sheep's doctrine — a philosophy fit for the meek and the still.

The objection was not aimed at a textbook Plato. It was aimed at a living disease, as Iqbal saw it. He believed that a strand of otherworldly, world-denying mysticism had seeped into the culture he loved and helped lull it into centuries of passivity — and that this strand traced part of its lineage back to Plato's elevation of contemplation over action. Attack the root, Iqbal reasoned, and you can free the branches.

It is worth being fair to Plato here, and Iqbal's critics have been. Plato's philosophy is far richer and more active than the caricature of pure escapism allows, and many readers think Iqbal pressed his case too hard. But that is exactly why the passage is revealing. It shows a thinker willing to put one of humanity's supreme minds on trial — not out of ignorance, but because he had a rival conviction he held even more deeply.

That conviction is the whole of Iqbal. Reality, for him, is not a finished pattern of Ideas to be glimpsed by the few who turn away from the world. Reality is alive, unfinished, and met through deed. His quarrel with Plato is the clearest possible statement of where he stands: not against thought, but against any philosophy, however ancient or revered, that asks a human being to stop moving.